Neoreviews
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS CME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Take the CME quiz:
 Vol. 7 No. 4, April 2006
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-Letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gosselin, J.
Right arrow Articles by Amiel-Tison, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gosselin, J.
Right arrow Articles by Amiel-Tison, C.

NeoReviews Vol.7 No.4 2006 e202
© 2006 American Academy of Pediatrics

Consequences of Uteroplacental Insufficiency on Developmental and Intellectual Performances

Julie Gosselin, PhD, OT*
Jean-Claude Fouron, MD{dagger}
Claudine Amiel-Tison, MD{ddagger}

* Associate Professor, School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
{dagger} Fetal Cardiology Unit, Ste-Justine Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
{ddagger} Emerita Professor of Pediatrics, Port-Royal-Baudelocque Hospital, University of Paris V, Paris, France

The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below.


   Objectives
 
After completing this article, readers should be able to:

  1. Explain why the difference between small for gestational age and intrauterine growth restriction is important for determining time of delivery.
  2. Describe the potential developmental consequences of placental insufficiency.
  3. Delineate the hypotheses underlying the association between prenatal stress and developmental outcome.


   Introduction
 
Deprivation of supplies is the common pathogenic factor for fetuses experiencing placental insufficiency, even if all do not exhibit hypotrophy at birth or accelerated maturation as a response to stress. Nearly one century ago, placental insufficiency was remarkably described by the French obstetrician Pierre Budin: "They are tiny, puny infants with great vitality. Their movements are untiring and their crying lusty, for their organs are quite capable of performing their allotted functions. These infants will live, for although their weight is inferior ... their sojourn in the womb was longer." (1)

Since then, normative growth curves and precise determination of gestational age (GA) have permitted consensual categorization of newborns, the last advance being the identification of an intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) subgroup among the small-for-gestational age (SGA) group (10th percentile). (2) However, this categorization remains unsatisfactory when dealing with the very preterm group for several reasons, including unknown GA in many cases and inadequacy of the current growth curves in the low range of GA.

Why is it so important to make a distinction between SGA and IUGR infants? First, the cause is different: genetic factors explain a large proportion of cases in SGA infants and epigenetic factors are involved in IUGR fetuses. This current conception is elegantly summarized by Fowden: "Normal fetal growth depends on an adequate supply of nutrients and on a strict temporal relationship between tissue accretion and differentiation. During early development, the pattern of intrauterine growth is largely determined by the fetal genome . . . [Full Text of this Article]






HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS CME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.