Neoreviews Subscribe to Pediatrics in Review
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS CME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Take the CME quiz:
 Vol. 6 No. 3, March 2005
Right arrow Author Disclosure
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-Letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Westrup, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Westrup, B.

NeoReviews Vol.6 No.3 2005 e115
© 2005 American Academy of Pediatrics

Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP)

Family-centered Developmentally Supportive Care

Björn Westrup, MD, PhD*

* Neonatal Program, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

Author Disclosure

Dr Westrup did not disclose any relationships relevant to this article.

The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below.


   Objectives
 
After completing this article, readers should be able to:

  1. Describe the concepts of the Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP).
  2. Review the primary findings of clinical investigations of NIDCAP.
  3. Describe barriers that must be overcome in research studies of NIDCAP.


   Introduction
 
The mortality among infants born preterm has decreased dramatically during the last decade in developed countries. The survival of very low-birthweight (VLBW) infants (<1,500 g) has increased from 50% (1) to more than 85% (2) since the initiation of neonatal intensive care in the early 1970s. However, a concomitant decrease in morbidity has not yet been documented conclusively. Pulmonary morbidity and neurodevelopmental outcome are the two major issues of concern. (3)(4) Employing the 1980 World Health Organization definition of disability, follow-up studies of VLBW infants have reported the incidence of disability to be 15% to 25%. (5)(6) A recent meta-analysis revealed that at school age, cognitive scores of former VLBW infants are approximately 10 points lower than those of matched control children (6) due to difficulties with attention, behavior, visual-motor integration, and language performance. (7)(8)

Important factors related to mortality and morbidity are: gestational age, birthweight, sex, premature rupture of membranes, chorioamnionitis, and brain white matter injury. However, the intensive care environment and family involvement also affect neurodevelopmental outcome.


   Development of the Brain
 
The fundamental objective of developmental care is to support the development of the child. Thus, brain development is one of the key issues. Sensory input affects the wiring of neuronal networks and their mode of functioning as well as the behavior of the newborn. (9)(10)(11)(12) Infants born very prematurely may be overstimulated during a critical period when their brains are developing rapidly (Figure. . . [Full Text of this Article]






HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS CME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.